Brevard Public Schools
Updated: Monday, August 25, 2008 Search This Site


District Directory
Customer Service BPS-TV Pre-Paid Lunch
School Menu
BPS Emergencies
- BPS Emergency site

- Are you ready for a
  hurricane? 7 Year Facility Plan Update
Vendor Information
- District Bid Activity

- Purchasing Services

SSNP



 

 

BPS SCORECARD
District Results Profile

Printer
 Friendly Page


Main

Brevard Public Schools
2700 Judge Fran Jamieson Way
Viera, Florida 32940

Phone: (321) 633-1000 ext. 500

Dr. Richard A. DiPatri, Superintendent

District Website: Click Here.
District Improvement Plan: Click Here.

Table of Contents:

 


DISTRICT DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

Total Enrollment
71824
 Stability Rate
99.07

 

Number

Percent
Free/Reduced Lunch

22032

29.51
Minority Enrollment
21854
30.42
Exceptional Ed (not gifted)
12298
17.12
Gifted Education
4582
6.37
English Language Learners
1539
2.14


DISTRICT GRADE

Figure 7.1-1 District Grade History

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
A A A Tied for 2nd in state for total number of points earned
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-1h District Grade: % of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
n/a n/a 68 11th in state
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-1a District Grade: % Meeting High Standards in Reading

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
73 74 76 4th in state
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-1i District Grade: Total Points Earned

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
439 442 578 2nd in state
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-1b District Grade: % Meeting High Standards in Math

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
80 81 82 3rd in state
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-1j District Grade: Rank in State based on Total Points Earned

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
3 3 2  
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-1c District l Grade: % Meeting High Standards in Writing

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
87 88 88 11th in state
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-2 District Summary Grade - % Schools Rated: “A”:

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
80.5% 82.9% 88.1% 55% in state
“A & B”:
95% 95% 96.4% 68% in state
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-1d District Grade: % Meeting High Standards in Science

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
n/a n/a 64 1st in state
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-3 Title I Elementary Schools Grade (% Schools “A”)

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
75.8% 86.2% 83% n/a
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-1e District Grade: % Making Reading Gains

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
63 63 65 4th in state
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-4 Elementary Schools Grade - % Schools Rated: “A”:

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
88% 93% 89% 63% in state
“A & B”:
96% 96% 96% 78% in state
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-1f District Grade: % Making Math Gains

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
76 75 76 1st in state
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-5 Middle Schools Grade - % Schools Rated: “A”:

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
75% 100% 100% 48% in state
“A & B”:
100% 100% 100% 66% in state
Indicator should increase
     
Figure 7.1-1g District Grade: % of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
60 61 59 11th in state
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-6 High Schools Grade - % Schools Rated: “A”: 50%

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
57% 29% 73% 14% in state
“A & B”:
86% 86% 93% 36% in state
Indicator should increase
   


Back to Table of Contents

AYP (NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress) Indicators

Figure 7.1-7 Schools Meeting AYP Standard (% Schools)

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
60.9% 48.7% 51.20% 33% in state
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-8a District AYP: % Scoring at or Above Grade Level in Reading

Subgroup 2005 2006 2007 State
2007
Total 66 68 69 57
White 71 72 74 68
Black 42 46 46 39
Hispanic 54 56 58 51
Econ Dis 54 56 57 46
ELL 28 31 36 36
SWD 36 38 40 31
Indicator should increase
Figure 7.1-8 District AYP: Total Possible Cells Meeting AYP Standard (% of Criteria Meet)

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
87% 87% 92% 77% in state
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-8b District AYP: % Scoring at or Above Grade Level in Math

Subgroup 2005 2006 2007 State
2007
Total 72 74 75 63
White 78 79 81 74
Black 45 48 49 43
Hispanic 62 62 65 57
Econ Dis 56 57 59 50
ELL 42 42 43 44
SWD 38 40 43 33
Indicator should increase
   


Back to Table of Contents

FCAT Indicators

FCAT Reading

Figure 7.1-9b FCAT Reading Percent at Level 1

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
15.0 13.6 13.0 12.8
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-9c FCAT Reading Percent meeting high standards (Levels 3, 4 or 5)

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
65.6 67.3 68.2 69.2
Indicator should increase
   


Back to Table of Contents

FCAT Mathematics

Figure 7.1-11b FCAT Mathematics Percent at Level 1

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
11.2 10.3 10.0 10
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-11c FCAT Mathematics Percent meeting high standards (Levels 3, 4 or 5)

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
72.0 73.4 74.7 74.9
Indicator should increase
   

 
   
Figure 7.1-19 FCAT Math – Learning Gap for Each Key Demographic Subgroup vs. White Students

Subgroup Year Overall
Percent(%)
Improvement
2007
Black 18.1% 37.2%
Hispanic 8.6% 31.7%
ESE 27.9% 19.6%
ED 12.3% 33.2%
ELL 29.4% 3.6%
Indicator should decrease		  
 


Back to Table of Contents

FCAT Science

Figure 7.1-12b FCAT Science Percent at Level 1

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
n/a 16.1 14.7 14.7
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-12c FCAT Science Percent meeting high standards (Levels 3, 4 or 5)

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
n/a 53.0 58.2 58.2
Indicator should increase
   


Back to Table of Contents

FCAT Writing

Figure 7.1-14d FCAT Writing Percent at Level 1

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
n/a n/a 16.1 16.1
Indicator should increase		  
Figure 7.1-14e FCAT Writing Percent Meeting High Standards at Levels 3, 4, 5

2005 2006 2007 Comparative
81.4 81.5 83.7 59.2
Indicator should increase
   


Back to Table of Contents

ACHIEVEMENT GAP INDICATORS

Figure 7.1-15 FCAT – Percent of All Brevard Students Scoring Level 1 vs. State Average

Subject Demographic Year State
Average
2006 2007
Reading All Students 14% 12.7% 22%
Math All Students 10% 10% 17%
Indicator should decrease		  
Figure 7.1-17a FCAT Math – Percent of Brevard’s Students, by Key Demographic Subgroup, Scoring Level 1

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2005 2006 2007 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 17%   11% 10% 10% -7%
White 12%   8% 7% 7% -6%
Black 41%   27% 25% 25% -17%
Hispanic 25%   20% 17% 15% -10%
ELL 51%   43% 37% 36% -15%
ED 31%   21% 20% 19% -12%
ESE 51%   41% 37% 34% -16%
Indicator should decrease
     
Figure 7.1-16-19 FCAT Learning Gap for Key
Demographics Subgroups (% Improvement
= difference between baseline and most
recent school years)

*baseline 2002 or first year reported

Figure 7.1-16a FCAT Reading – Percent of Brevard’s Students, by Key Demographic Subgroup, Scoring Level 1

Subgroup 2002/
Baseline		   2005 2006 2007 %Improved
baseline to
current year
All Students 21%   15% 14% 13% -8%
White 16%   11% 10% 9% -7%
Black 45%